Table dos presents this new evaluations regarding passion and proficiency for each and every subgroup of men, and you may matched examples t-examination (two tailed) contrasting for every single group’s enthusiasm and you can skills corrected to own multiple research from the the fresh Holm-Bonferroni modification (Holm, 1979; Gaetano, 2018). Stereotypes of subgroups of males across the love and you can ability axes is actually plotted inside the Profile dos. Such as the outcomes for the brand new subgroups of females, male political leaders, management, businessmen, and rich guys had been stereotyped because the skilled however, cold. Males referred to as unmarried, bachelors, rockers, or immigrants was seen as cool, and less skilled, regardless if skills scores was rather greater than passion studies having rockers and you may bachelors. Useful men, work boys, sporty people, male children, and you will male academics have been stereotyped as the competent and meagerly loving, much like the superordinate category of people in the previous search inside the Norway (Bye ainsi que al., 2014). One another fathers regarding small children and unmarried fathers, together with silky guys, were regarded as for example warm, however, smaller skilled. Such teams was indeed on the enjoying however, incompetent quadrant of SCM space, along with homosexual boys and you may old boys.
Shape dos. Means of love and you will competence to possess subgroups of males. Dotted lines mean grand setting across subgroups. Please be aware that the axes regarding the figure have been truncated.
Next, i opposed the newest stereotypes of females and you may men in the same societal positions and you can groups round the multiple subgroups. Means and you can practical deviations is presented in the Table 3. Matched up trials t-assessment (two tailed), once again fixed to own several investigations of the Holm-Bonferroni correction (Holm, 1979; Gaetano, 2018), indicated that desire evaluations off subgroups of females was significantly high as opposed to those regarding subgroups of men for 5 regarding 12 evaluations (industry girls, old women, immigrant lady, lady academics, and you may single lady was basically all rated because relatively much warmer than simply their parallel male subgroups). Within the half a dozen era, passion feedback out-of synchronous subgroups of women and you can people didn’t differ notably (moms and dads that have young children, female and male management, male and female pupils, male and female politicians, exercise/sporty gents and ladies, and you can outdoorsy both women and men). Really the only comparison where in fact the desire rating away from an excellent subgroup of men is notably higher than compared to an excellent subgroup off female was in the outcome off unmarried moms and dads: single dads was ranked because the much warmer than just solitary parents.
This may advise that there can be type about attitudes out of lesbians across the federal setup, but variations around the samples could also reflect methodological factors, including and this almost every other communities participants keeps rated as these get act as anchors towards ratings regarding lesbians
Subgroups of males were rated as more skilled as compared to parallel subgroup of women in two away from twelve contrasting (unmarried dads and you may old boys was indeed ranked as more competent than simply their parallel ladies subgroups). Inside eight comparisons, you will find not a distinction in skills critiques away from synchronous subgroups (community people and entrepreneurs, male and female frontrunners, female and male politicians, outdoorsy men and women, do so ladies and you can stylish people, immigrant both women and men, and parents having young children) 
. Ultimately, for the about three comparisons, subgroups of females was indeed rated as the high into the proficiency (solitary people, females academics and you may women youngsters instead of single people, men academics, and you can male students, respectively). The positioning of the synchronous subgroups of females and boys is exhibited inside the Shape step 3.
Contour 3. A style of passion and skills to possess synchronous subgroups of females and you will boys. Squares depict subgroups of males; dots depict subgroups of females. Dotted traces imply grand function around the subgroups. Take note your axes throughout the profile have been truncated.
Conversation
All of our show give an introduction to stereotypes off sex subgroups when you look at the good Norwegian context, responding needs lookup beyond the You context (Sczesny et al., 2019). Regardless of the state’s positions as among the earth’s most sex equal places (Business Monetary Forum, 2020), our brings about a large the total amount resonate with extant research to your gender stereotypes (Ellemers, 2018), ambivalent sexism (Glick and Fiske, 2001, 2011), and you can public part principle (Eagly and you can Timber, 2012; Koenig and Eagly, 2014). People inside the proper care-providing roles generally arranged for females try represented since the stereotypically enjoying and reduced in competence. Both women and men in the conventional men spots (frontrunners, people in politics, and businesspeople) is stereotypically skilled and you may lower in love. Our show from intimate minorities fall into line with other search in finding stereotypes from gay men to indicate higher love and modest competence (Mize and you may Manago, 2018; Klysing mais aussi al., 2021). In terms of stereotypes off lesbians, we located reasonable ascriptions off each other skills and you will enthusiasm, relative to Klysing et al., 2021 (Investigation dos). Other people have indicated stereotypes off lesbians to help you ambivalent, with higher ratings with the proficiency/service than warmth (Klysing et al., 2021, Data step one; Mize and Manago, 2018).